Amy fantasy
What was the point of The Library at Mount Char? It somehow includes a couple likeable characters while, at the same time, placing them into the most far-fetched, incomprehensible story arc I’ve ever read. Well, that’s not quite true. Just recently, I read The Fifth Season by N.K. Jemisin which was another mind-boggling novel. But, The Library at Mount Char was more character-based (at least, the situations were character-based) and was set in a current America (instead of some unknown future world) so it was a bit more relatable. And yet, it was completely bizarre. Nothing seemed believable. Nothing made me feel invested in the characters or settings or storyline. It was all just a giant mind-blow as if the author wrote down his drug-induced, nonsensical dreams. And yet, there were a few moments that were really fun to read about, especially all scenes involving lions.
Overall, I did not like it. I prefer novels that tell a definite story or have purpose. This novel just is. It serves no purpose that I can determine other than to mystify. I think Scott Hawkins was trying to provide a fantastical explanation for things which humans ascribe to God. But, I wasn’t buying it. It was just crazytown.
I just read a few reviews by people who loved this book because I want to understand why it is highly rated. Several of the reviews started the same way mine did—variations of “What did I just read?” But, where they think this author is a fantasy genius, I am not an appreciator of the level of craziness. Several mentioned that they had no idea what was going on at the beginning. I don’t remember thinking that so much but, then again, I had just recently read The Fifth Season which seemed much more incomprehensible to me. So, I guess it’s all a matter of perspective. I agree that the author is extremely creative. This novel is definitely unique. But it didn’t do it for me. I'd only give it two stars but I'll add another half for the humor in the novel, which was appreciated.




